Monkeypox Diagnostic Test Specifications: Navigating WHO’s TPPs

WHO publishes specifications for monkeypox tests

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently unveiled two pivotal Target Product Profiles (TPPs) for monkeypox diagnostic test specifications. As the diagnostic landscape evolves, it becomes imperative for diagnostic manufacturers to align with these international benchmarks. MDx CRO stands at the forefront as a strategic CRO and regulatory consulting partner to navigate these benchmarks with precision and compliance.

Deciphering WHO’s TPPs

The intended patient population in both TPPs are individuals suspected of monkeypox infection, including children and adults, TPP1 is tailored for NAAT (nucleic acid amplification tests) qualitative diagnostic test applications within healthcare settings and laboratories. TPP1 is directed towards laboratories or point of care facilities, such as a outpatient or STI clinics, emergency units or other settings near patient care. It mandates a test that boasts high diagnostic sensitivity (≥95%), specificity (≥97%) when compared to a reference molecular method.

  • Sample type: lesion material or mucosal swabs (excluding saliva).
  • The test’s intended user is typically laboratory personnel or a trained healthcare professional (when used near-patient).
  • Closed molecular systems and tests that do not require extraction prior to amplification/detection are preferred. 
  • Test design: 2 independent target regions with at least one target that is monkeypox specific. The IFU should specify the assay’s target region.  
  • Results should be obtained in under 4 hours and preferable under 1 hour.

In contrast, TPP2 should be used for tests that aid the diagnosis of orthopoxvirus antigens, such as qualitative lateral flow immunoassays tailored for decentralized used, including in the community, rural environments and low-resource settings. Results should be interpreted visually and/or through digital readout via smartphone. Tests should demonstrate adequate diagnostic sensitivity (≥80%), specificity (≥97%) for community based settings when compared to a reference molecular method.

  • Sample type: lesion material, mucosal swabs or saliva. When present, lesions are the preferred sample type.
  • The test should be designed for use by non-lab trained intended users.
  • The target analyte is the monkeypox virus antigen/protein. Tests targeting antibody detection are not acceptable. 
  • Results should be obtained quickly in under 40 minutes and preferable under 20 minutes, a crucial feature for time-sensitive environments such as outbreak regions or remote settings

The creation of WHO monkeypox diagnostic test specifications was underpinned by a comprehensive process, involving myriad experts from fields such as science, public health, and regulation. A crucial step involved a public consultation phase, ensuring the TPPs were refined with broad feedback before finalization. This initiative by WHO is a hallmark in the trajectory of creating robust diagnostic tools for monkeypox and related orthopoxviruses.

Partnering with MDx CRO for your monkeypox test development 

MDx CRO is unwavering in its commitment to support the development and clinical trials that meet monkeypox diagnostic test specifications. Our services, fortified by vast expertise, encompass areas such as meticulous IVD clinical performance study design, efficient sample collection and analysis, and stringent regulatory compliance across multiple jurisdictions, with an emphasis on CE marking under the IVDR.

While the TPPs provide an essential blueprint, the diagnostic journey also demands attention to several critical facets:

  • Study Populations: Defining the optimal study population is paramount. Such a population should encompass individuals potentially benefiting from the test, including those suspected of monkeypox or those at elevated risk of exposure.
  • Reference Standards: Leveraging appropriate reference standards ensures validation of the test’s accuracy and reliability, forming the backbone of its developmental and evaluative processes. Samples should cover a range of clinically relevant viral loads as per the reference method used. 
  • IVD Clinical Study Design of monkeypox tests should include prospective or leftover specimens, covering a clinically relevant viral load. MDx CRO can help design and execute clinical performance studies in alignment with the WHO TPP and IVDR CE mark expectations.

With the scientific acumen and regulatory insights of MDx CRO, diagnostic manufacturers can confidently navigate the intricacies of the WHO’s TPPs and other global benchmarks.

Planning to develop an IVD monkeypox test or to conduct an EU based clinical trial? Contact us today to find out how MDx CRO can accelerate your development journey.

Written by:
Carlos Galamba

Carlos Galamba

CEO

Senior regulatory leader and former BSI IVDR reviewer with deep experience in CE marking high-risk IVDs, companion diagnostics, and IVDR implementation.
Industry Insights & Regulatory Updates

Navigating the IVDR CDx Certification Pathway

The evolving landscape of Companion Diagnostics (CDx) introduces complexities in regulatory and certification processes. Engaging in IVDR Companion Diagnostic Consulting is essential to ensure a streamlined and compliant journey.

Deciphering Regulatory Nuances: US vs. EU

Historically, CDx devices in the EU were self-certified under the IVDD. A CDx manufacturer may have had experience with the FDA but the regulatory process in the EU is only now emerging.

The EU IVDR defines a CDx as a device which is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding medicinal product to identify, before and/or during treatment:

  • Patients who are most likely to benefit from the corresponding medicinal product
  • Patients likely to be at increased risk of serious adverse reaction as a result of treatment with a corresponding medicinal product

The FDA’s definition is similar but extends to devices used for “monitoring treatment responses with a particular therapeutic product”. Unlike in the US such devices are not considered companion diagnostics in the EU. Furthermore, the FDA acknowledges a category of devices termed complementary diagnostics. These diagnostics are characterized as tests that pinpoint a group of patients, identified by specific biomarkers, who respond well to a drug. While they assist in evaluating the risk-benefit ratio for individual patients, they aren’t mandatory for drug administration. Within the IVDR framework, complementary diagnostics aren’t explicitly detailed, nor do they have specific prerequisites for CE certification

These nuances are key for any CDx regulatory strategy and for the planning of CDx clinical trials. A specialized IVDR CDx consulting company like MDx CRO can help diagnostic companies and their pharma partners navigate global differences and ensure CDx regulatory compliance.

The EMA Consultation Process

EMA’s guidance stands as a pivotal component in IVDR Companion Diagnostic Consulting. The EMA CDx Assessment Report Template, publicly available, provides a comprehensive blueprint. It is a great source of information for the expectations in CDx submission content, particularly useful for when drafting SSPs and IFUs.

MDx CRO published a comprehensive guide to the CDx consultation process.

The process encompasses:

  • Declaration of intent.
  • EMA Rapporteur appointment.
  • Optional, but highly recommended, pre-submission meeting.
  • Application submission.
  • Interactive Q&A phases.
  • EMA’s final verdict.

Crafting of SSP & IFU with Detail

For successful IVDR CDx certification, the SSP and IFU documents should be meticulously detailed as they are the 2 key documents used during the EMA consultation process.

Diagnostic manufacturers should ensure they include:

  • Emphasis on scientific validity of the biomarker
  • Comprehensive detail on performance evaluation, study design descriptions, encompassing both analytical and clinical performance.
  • Insight into clinical data, detail on device modifications during or after the clinical performance study, and associated impacts, rationale for cut-off point selection and more.

A deep dive into the risk-benefit analysis is pivotal, concentrating on major residual risks and device limitations.

Time Considerations for IVDR CDx Certification

The certification process for CDx under IVDR is extensive. From the initial 3-month EMA notification to the concluding recommendation, the timeline can span 8-18 months. Such extended durations underline the criticality of early preparations. Engaging early with a specialized CDx consulting company can help avoid surprises and streamline the CDx certification journey.

The expertise offered by the notified body can significantly enrich IVDR Companion Diagnostic certification. Early engagements, prior to document submissions, can provide clarity, ensuring alignment with EMA requirements.

Selecting your IVDR CDx Consulting partner

MDx CRO has published a deep dive into the crucial factors to bear in mind when picking an IVD consultant.

In the dynamic realm of CDx, efficient navigation is paramount. If you’re seeking specialized insights into IVDR certification, explore our IVD services. At MDx CRO, our experts offers tailored IVDR Companion Diagnostic Consulting, ensuring optimal integration of CDx within the regulatory framework.

Contact our team today to discuss your CDx product needs!

Written by:
Carlos Galamba

Carlos Galamba

CEO

Senior regulatory leader and former BSI IVDR reviewer with deep experience in CE marking high-risk IVDs, companion diagnostics, and IVDR implementation.
Industry Insights & Regulatory Updates

IVDR Transition: Insights from the Dutch Authority

State of play of IVDR Transition:

In the realm of in vitro diagnostics (IVD), a seismic shift is underway as manufacturers grapple with the complexities of transitioning to the new European In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). This transition, necessitated by advancements in technology and evolving patient safety concerns, brings both challenges and opportunities for IVD manufacturers. A recent report by the Dutch Competent Authority (IGJ) delves into the progress, setbacks, and strategies of IVD manufacturers in their journey toward IVDR compliance. Over 40% of respondents raised doubts about whether they will be able to obtain the CE marking for their IVDs before the transition periods expire.

The IGJ Report Findings:

The IGJ report sheds light on the multifaceted landscape of the IVDR transition. Manufacturers are confronted with stringent requirements that demand a paradigm shift in their approach to product development, documentation, quality assurance, and post-market surveillance. The report identifies several key challenges:

  1. Technical Documentation Overhaul: The IVDR mandates comprehensive and meticulously documented technical files and dossiers. This demand presents a considerable challenge as manufacturers strive to align existing documentation with the new regulations. Additionally, the dynamic nature of diagnostic technologies requires continuous updates, further complicating the documentation process. Gathering of IVDR Clinical Evidence is particularly challenging for manufacturers due to lack of guidelines and international coordination. For example, application for clinical performance studies across Member States is not fully harmonised.
  2. Certification Complexities: Acquiring the necessary certification from Notified Bodies is a crucial step in the IVDR transition. However, the IGJ report underscores the intricate nature of the certification process, involving rigorous assessments and evaluations. This complexity can lead to delays in bringing products to market. Notified Bodies have reported delays in the certification process due to lack of information in the IVDR technical documentation and also lack of structure and clarity in the file.
  3. Post-Market Surveillance Emphasis: The IVDR places increased importance on post-market surveillance (PMS) and vigilance. Manufacturers are expected to establish robust systems for monitoring the performance and safety of their products throughout their lifecycle. This shift necessitates a proactive approach to identifying and addressing potential issues. 80% of respondents have adapted their vigilance procedures to IVDR requirements, however compliance to PMS System, PMS plan and PMPF requirements is lower, at 70% of respondents. The IGJ has declared they will promote or enforce compliance through random inspection visits.
  4. Educational Imperative: The IGJ report emphasizes the significance of educating all stakeholders, from manufacturers to regulatory bodies, about the intricacies of IVDR compliance. Adequate training is crucial to ensure that everyone understands their roles, responsibilities, and the broader implications of the new regulation.

The Role of MDx CRO in your IVDR Transition:

Amid these challenges, MDx CRO emerges as a guiding light for IVD manufacturers. As the industry grapples with the transformative implications of the IVDR, MDx CRO stands as a stalwart partner, offering expert guidance and tailored solutions to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape.

Strategic Guidance: MDx CRO’s team of seasoned experts provides strategic advice that empowers manufacturers to make informed decisions. Transitioning to the IVDR isn’t just about compliance; it requires a forward-looking approach that considers the long-term impact on products and business strategies.

Technical Documentation Excellence: The IGJ report highlights the criticality of accurate and comprehensive technical documentation. MDx CRO’s expertise shines in this arena, aiding manufacturers in compiling technical files and dossiers that meet IVDR standards while showcasing the safety and innovation of their products.

Certification Support: With the certification process’s complexities highlighted in the report, MDx CRO’s collaborative approach becomes invaluable. By assisting manufacturers in preparing for interactions with Notified Bodies, MDx CRO streamlines the certification journey, ensuring quicker time-to-market for products. Read about our pre-submission service.

Continuous Partnership: The IGJ report’s emphasis on post-market surveillance aligns with MDx CRO’s commitment to the entire product lifecycle. Beyond the transition, MDx CRO supports manufacturers in establishing robust PMS systems, enabling them to meet ongoing compliance and safety monitoring requirements.

Knowledge Dissemination: As underscored by the report, education is pivotal in a successful IVDR transition. MDx CRO’s training and workshops empower manufacturers with the insights and understanding needed to navigate the new landscape with confidence.

Conclusions:

The IGJ report provides a comprehensive view of the challenges and advancements in the IVD sector’s transition to IVDR compliance. One message is clear, the IGJ unequivocally mandates manufacturers to expedite IVDR certification without delay. This is key to prevent peak in applications when the transition period come to an end. Within this landscape, MDx CRO emerges as a crucial enabler, equipping manufacturers with the tools, expertise, and support needed to thrive in the new regulatory era. By offering strategic guidance, technical excellence, certification support, ongoing collaboration, and knowledge dissemination, MDx CRO paves the way for compliant, innovative, and patient-centered IVD products. As the industry continues to navigate the evolving regulatory seas, MDx CRO stands as a steadfast partner in this transformative journey.

Contact our team today to discuss your IVDR transition needs!

Written by:
Carlos Galamba

Carlos Galamba

CEO

Senior regulatory leader and former BSI IVDR reviewer with deep experience in CE marking high-risk IVDs, companion diagnostics, and IVDR implementation.
Industry Insights & Regulatory Updates

Carlos Galamba: Your Trusted IVD Consultant and IVDR Expert

Innovative medical professional specializing in MedTech advancements at MDX, focusing on accelerating healthcare innovation and improving patient outcomes through cutting-edge technology.
Carlos Galamba, CEO MDx CRO

Carlos Galamba, IVD Consultant – MDx CRO Founder

In the intricate landscape of In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) and the evolving In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR), one name stands out as a beacon of expertise and guidance – Carlos Galamba. With a wealth of experience spanning over 18 years in the IVD sector, Carlos is a seasoned consultant who has left an indelible mark on the world of diagnostics.

Pioneering Path to Regulatory Mastery

Carlos’s journey commenced as a biomedical scientist, setting the stage for a remarkable career journey. His trailblazing role as the first in-house clinician for IVDs at BSI (British Standards Institution), a renowned Notified Body, played a pivotal role in shaping the clinical oversight process for hundreds of diagnostics. From genetic tests to molecular assays, point-of-care diagnostics, CDx, LDTs / in-house assays, NGS and beyond, Carlos expertise is unrivaled. This groundbreaking contribution has significantly impacted how the industry approaches regulatory compliance.

Mastering the IVDR Landscape

Carlos Galamba’s expertise extends well beyond his role at BSI. His insights have positioned him as a distinguished external expert for the EU Commission, where he provides invaluable guidance in navigating the intricate IVDR terrain. His strategic acumen has propelled prominent companies like Biomerieux, Cepheid, Leica, Hologic, Abbott, Thermofisher, Werfen and more toward achieving excellence in IVDR compliance.

Guiding Innovation in IVD

At the helm of innovation, Carlos Galamba served as the Vice President of IVD Intelligence & Innovation at RQM+. His technical thought leadership encompassed an array of IVD technologies, ranging from immunoassays to more complex next-generation sequencing tests and IVD Software. Carlos’s insights have led to the development of competitive intelligence strategies that drive expansion and commercialization within the IVD consultancy sector.

A Catalyst for Regulatory Success

Carlos’s dedication to simplifying the complex is the cornerstone of his approach. His tailored solutions empower businesses to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape while gaining a competitive edge. His remarkable achievements, including leading the transition to the new EU medical device legislation (IVDR) at several companies and successfully implementing pivotal regulatory changes, position Carlos Galamba as a catalyst for transformative IVD projects.

Connect with MDx CRO for Regulatory Excellence

Whether you’re an IVD startup with ambitious goals or a global diagnostics manufacturer looking to streamline regulatory processes, Carlos Galamba’s expertise is your compass for regulatory mastery. If your company is seeking unparalleled IVD consulting, don’t hesitate to connect with Carlos and his team at MDx CRO. Together, they bring a wealth of knowledge to guide you through the complexities of IVD regulations.

Connect with Carlos on LinkedIn

In the complex landscape of In Vitro Diagnostics and the evolving IVDR framework, Carlos Galamba’s expertise continues to set the standard for regulatory excellence. His extensive experience and leadership exemplify how deep regulatory insight and practical guidance can shape successful IVD strategies and ensure lasting compliance under the IVDR.

Industry Insights & Regulatory Updates

IVD Regulatory Services by MDx CRO

At MDx CRO, our specialized IVD regulatory services cater not only to in vitro diagnostic medical device manufacturers, companion diagnostics (CDx) companies and their pharma partners, laboratories, suppliers, IVD subcontractors and more. Our in-depth knowledge and expertise make us stand out in the constantly evolving landscape of IVD regulations.

Why Choose MDx CRO for IVD Regulatory Services?

  • IVD Compliance Mastery: MDx CRO assists IVD manufacturers throughout the entire product life cycle. We ensure you achieve and maintain compliance with IVD regulations across various countries.
  • Regulatory Expertise: We not only understand the EU IVDR regulation but are also proficient in the transition from IVDD to IVDR, the FDA IVD requirements in the US, and pre-submission reviews. This comprehensive know-how ensures your product’s smooth and swift entry into the US and EU medical device markets.
  • Tailored Services: Be it a start-up, SME, or multinational company, MDx CRO’s bespoke IVD consultancy services are designed to meet your unique needs.

Our IVD Regulatory Service Spectrum

  • New Device Development: We guide you through design, development, and market access strategy formulation based on your intended purpose.
  • Regulatory Transitions: Navigate the shifts from IVDD to IVDR effortlessly with our expert insights into necessary requirements and adjustments.
  • Market Expansion: From the US FDA to EU-IVDR, our regulatory submission support ensures you comprehend and meet the distinct requirements of global markets.
  • Commercialization Support: MDx CRO ensures that your device meets all prerequisites for commercial distribution, including device labeling, training materials, and regulatory submissions.

Engage with Seasoned Experts

Our specialists, equipped with industry-centric design and development skills fused with regulatory acumen, are here to provide unparalleled guidance. IVD analytical and clinical performance support can significantly benefit from our specialized expertise.

IVD Manufacturers’ Guide

  • IVD Regulatory Strategy: We assist in devising the most fitting regulatory approach for your IVD products with our unique IVD roadmap solutions.
  • IVD Technical File Support: Let us help in completing or reviewing your IVD Technical Files to ensure full compliance with the IVDR (EU) 2017/746, paving the way for a hassle-free CE-IVD approval.
  • Gap Analysis: Gauge the difference between your Quality Management System and IVDR (EU) 2017/746 requirements to stay ahead.
  • Mock & Supplier Audits: Be audit-ready always with our comprehensive audit services, including our IVDR pre-submission service.

Embracing Quality and Excellence

At MDx CRO, quality is our benchmark. Our global team, adept at vendor auditing for diagnostic and laboratory partners, ensures QMS audits in compliance with globally recognized standards.

MDx CRO’s integrated approach, assures sponsors of audit compliance, helping them prepare for any potential international regulatory inspections.

Join forces with MDx CRO and navigate the intricate world of IVD regulations with confidence. Let’s embark on this transformative journey together!

Contact us today to discuss your project needs!

Industry Insights & Regulatory Updates

Companion Diagnostics IVD Consultancy within the EMA Framework: Comprehensive Guidance

The field of companion diagnostics IVD (CDx) represents a confluence of technological innovation, regulatory compliance, and patient care. As personalized medicine becomes an integral part of healthcare, the regulatory framework governing CDx, including the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR), has become more complex. This scenario calls for a specialized companion diagnostics consultancy. MDx CRO is at the forefront of this arena, offering expertise and guidance in the process for CDx consultation with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Notified Body preparation and IVDR compliance within the European Union (EU).

Companion Diagnostics IVD and their Role

CDx are in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests designed to provide information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding medicinal product. Their applications could include:

  • Identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from a particular therapeutic product.
  • Determining patients’ suitability for specific treatments.
  • Monitoring responses to ongoing treatments.

The Impact of IVDR on Companion Diagnostics

The IVDR sets out robust legal requirements for in vitro diagnostic medical devices, including CDx. Key aspects include:

  • Enhanced Patient Safety: Ensuring the quality and reliability of CDx IVDs.
  • Stricter Oversight: Increased scrutiny of the CDx development and approval process. Unlike the previous directive, CDx now require conformity assessment by a Notified Body, an independent organization designated to assess the compliance of medical devices and in-vitro diagnostics. In addition, CDx are also assessed by a medicines authority, most likely the EMA (European Medicines Agency), but a competent authority could also be involved .
  • Comprehensive Technical Documentation: Increased clinical evidence requirements are particularly notable in the IVDR. MDx CRO can help CDx manufacturers and their drug partners gather the necessary data to support their CDx application. This data may include clinical trial data (clinical performance data), analytical data, and safety data. Manufacturers must provide robust clinical evidence to demonstrate the performance, safety, and clinical utility of the CDx.

There are a number of other factors that can affect the approval process for CDx in the EU. These factors include:

  • The availability of data: Both the Notified Body and the EMA will need to have access to data from clinical trials that demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the CDx.
  • The complexity of the CDx: The more complex the CDx, the more difficult it will be to assess its safety and effectiveness.
  • The novelty of the CDx: If the CDx involves new technologies or indications, the EMA and the Notified Body will need to take a more cautious approach to its approval. Different scenarios will play a role on the extent of scrutiny involved, including co-developed CDx scenarios, follow-on CDx, and CDx already on the market under the old IVD directive.

Understanding the EMA Companion Diagnostics Consultation Procedure

The consultation procedure is initiated by the notified body when it receives an application from a CDx manufacturer. The medicinal product involved could be a medicine already authorised for marketing in the EU or a medicine undergoing approval. Aligning drug and diagnostic development processes can help to ensure that the results of the clinical trials are accurate and reliable, and that the medicine is safe and effective when used with the CDx.

Aligning timelines in the drug and diagnostic (CDx) development process can help to ensure that the clinical trials for the medicine are conducted in a way that is consistent with the intended use of the CDx.

Upon application for a CDx IVD approval, the notified body will submit a letter of intent to the EMA, along with a technical dossier that describes the CDx and the medicinal product.

The EMA will then appoint a rapporteur, who will be responsible for reviewing the technical dossier and issuing a scientific opinion on the suitability of the CDx for use with the medicinal product. The rapporteur will also consider the views of any other interested parties, such as the applicant for the medicinal product, the manufacturer of the CDx, and patient groups.

The EMA will provide its scientific opinion on the CDx aspects that relate to the medicine to the notified body. The notified body will then use the EMA’s opinion to make a decision on whether to grant the CE mark to the CDx, in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the in vitro diagnostics regulation (EU IVDR).

EMA procedure timetables play a major role in the success of the consultation and turn around times for responses can be extremely short. Manufacturers should factor this in as they plan for their CDx submissions. There is the possibility to request a pre-submission meeting which will include representatives from Notified Bodies, EMA and could also include the drug manufacturer – this is used strictly to align on procedural and timing considerations (it is not used to provide feedback on study design or the content of the technical documentation).

One of the key documents used in the consultation and submitted by the notified body to the EMA is the SSP (Summary of Safety and Performance). The EMA expects manufacturers to use the SSP template provided in MDCG 2022-9. A lot more detail is expected in the SSP when compared to the information provided in the IFU. For example, detail on concordance studies is needed, particularly for co-developed CDx when different versions of a diagnostic have been used throughout the clinical development program.

MDx CRO: Your Partner in Companion Diagnostics Consultancy

Our companion diagnostics consultancy services encompass every stage of development, approval, and post-market surveillance:

  • Guidance on IVDR Requirements: In-depth support in understanding and meeting the specific demands of IVDR as they relate to CDx. MDx CRO can help a diagnostics company identify the specific requirements that apply to its CDx. For example, the requirements for a CDx that is intended to assess a patient’s suitability for treatment may be different from the requirements for a CDx that is intended to be used to monitor a patient’s response to treatment.
  • Preparation for Notified Body Assessment: Tailored strategies for successful assessment of a CDx under the IVDR: Assistance with compiling and submitting the necessary technical documentation and quality related documents.
  • Providing training to the manufacturer’s staff: MDx CRO can provide training to the manufacturer’s staff on the EMA’s requirements for CDx, as well as the notified body’s assessment process and expectations. This training will help to ensure that the manufacturer’s staff are prepared to answer any notified body questions and increase chances of success.
  • Stakeholder Communication: Facilitating communication with all relevant parties.
  • Global Perspective: Navigating international considerations for CDx in multi-country studies.
  • Post-Market Support: Focused on maintaining the highest standards through ongoing compliance monitoring with IVDR and other regulatory requirements. This includes implementing strong post-market surveillance processes and Post-Market Performance Follow-up (PMPF) evaluations, monitoring the CDx’s performance in real-world clinical settings, tracking and analyzing adverse events related to CDx usage, and conducting ongoing studies to evaluate the long-term impact and effectiveness of the CDx.

Why MDx CRO for Companion Diagnostics IVD Consultancy?

  1. Expertise: Our in-depth knowledge of CDx, IVDR, and EU regulations offers unparalleled support.
  2. Collaboration: Working closely with clients, we tailor our approach to meet specific needs.
  3. Efficiency: Our insights and guidance save valuable time and resources, simplifying complex regulatory pathways.
  4. Commitment: Our dedication to excellence, patient safety, and innovation sets us apart.

Navigating the multifaceted world of companion diagnostics in the EU, with the added complexity of IVDR, requires a dedicated and skilled partner. MDx CRO stands ready to be your guide in this critical journey, ensuring alignment with all regulatory standards. Reach out to explore how our companion diagnostics consultancy can be the key to unlocking your CDx potential in the EU’s dynamic regulatory environment.

FAQs

Q: What is a co-developed Companion Diagnostics in the context of EMA consultation?

A: A co-developed CDx is a device developed alongside a medicinal product for either initial authorization or a change of indication. This can include development during a pivotal clinical trial or a bridging study, with sufficient documentation to ensure performance alignment.

Q: How does a follow-on CDx differ from a co-developed CDx?

A: A follow-on CDx seeks the same indication as the original CDx but is not developed in parallel with the medicinal product. The follow-on CDx targets the same biomarker but may not be based on the same technology. It should be highly comparable to the original in performance, safety, and effectiveness.

Q: What documentation is required for a follow-on CDx?

A: Sufficient documentation must be provided for a follow-on CDx to prove that its analytical performance is comparable to the original CDx and that there’s no impact on clinical performance incompatible with the safe and effective use of the medicinal product.

Q: How are devices transitioning from IVDD to IVDR handled?

A: Devices initially marketed under Directive 98/79/EC (IVDD) that transition to IVDR fall under the co-developed or follow-on scenarios, depending on how they were initially developed.

Q: Is it possible to proceed with a single CDx consultation procedure for multiple authorized medicinal products and indications?

A: Yes, if a device’s intended purpose includes several authorized medicinal products and indications, it’s recommended to proceed with one single CDx consultation procedure. All concerned medicinal products should be listed in the intention to submit a letter by the Notified Body and in the application form.

Written by:
Carlos Galamba

Carlos Galamba

CEO

Senior regulatory leader and former BSI IVDR reviewer with deep experience in CE marking high-risk IVDs, companion diagnostics, and IVDR implementation.
Industry Insights & Regulatory Updates